Peggle 2

I won't vote negative but seriously, making solutions for achievements that clearly and obviously do not need them is kind of stupid and it looks bad. A solution should be well thought-out and relevant - i.e., it needs to serve a purpose. This doesn't. This achievement has a 1.00 ratio. No one needs help and you know it. So why make it?

There are plenty of achievements on this website that have a TA ratio of 1.00 that other people have created where seemingly no one will need help, but I bet each solution has helped at least one person throughout the time its been on this website. Therefore I consider that a success. This solution is intended to highlight the fact that every time you play a level, the location of the orange pegs is completely random, a fact the game fails to mention until you are near the end of Peggle Institute. Someone will read this and not know that. They may be reading through the solutions before deciding whether or not to buy the game. Just because its a low value achievement, doesnt mean everyone instantly knows what to do. I hate to use CoD as a reference but I have heard some hellish stories about the Mile High Club achievement on Modern Warfare on how difficult it is, yet that has 26 guides yet only a TA ratio of 1.90. Someone, somewhere will find this useful, and like I said I consider that a success. If you didnt need a guide for this, fair play.